To meet climate targets, the IPCC underscores the necessity of technologies capable of removing gigatonnes of CO2 annually, with Geological Carbon Storage (GCS) playing a central role. GCS involves capturing CO2 and injecting it into deep geological formations for long-term storage, requiring precise monitoring to ensure containment and prevent leakage. Time-lapse seismic imaging is essential for tracking CO2 migration but often struggles to capture the complexities of multi-phase subsurface flow. Digital Shadows (DS), leveraging machine learning-driven data assimilation techniques such as nonlinear Bayesian filtering and generative AI, provide a more detailed, uncertainty-aware monitoring approach. By incorporating uncertainties in reservoir properties, DS frameworks improve CO2 migration forecasts, reducing risks in GCS operations. However, data assimilation depends on assumptions regarding reservoir properties, rock physics models, and initial conditions, which, if inaccurate, can compromise prediction reliability. This study demonstrates that augmenting forecast ensembles with diverse rock physics models mitigates the impact of incorrect assumptions and improves predictive accuracy, particularly in differentiating uniform versus patchy saturation models.

Geological Carbon Storage GCS is arguably the only scalable net-negative CO2 emission technology available While promising subsurface complexities and heterogeneity of reservoir properties demand a systematic approach to quantify uncertainty when optimizing production and mitigating storage risks which include assurances of Containment and Conformance of injected supercritical CO2 As a first step towards the design and implementation of a Digital Twin for monitoring underground storage operations a machine learning based data-assimilation framework is introduced and validated on carefully designed realistic numerical simulations As our implementation is based on Bayesian inference but does not yet support control and decision-making we coin our approach an uncertainty-aware Digital Shadow To characterize the posterior distribution for the state of CO2 plumes conditioned on multi-modal time-lapse data the envisioned Shadow combines techniques from Simulation-Based Inference SBI and Ensemble Bayesian Filtering to establish probabilistic baselines and assimilate multi-modal data for GCS problems that are challenged by large degrees of freedom nonlinear multi-physics non-Gaussianity and computationally expensive to evaluate fluid flow and seismic simulations To enable SBI for dynamic systems a recursive scheme is proposed where the Digital Shadows neural networks are trained on simulated ensembles for their state and observed data well and/or seismic Once training is completed the systems state is inferred when time-lapse field data becomes available In this computational study we observe that a lack of knowledge on the permeability field can be factored into the Digital Shadows uncertainty quantification To our knowledge this work represents the first proof of concept of an uncertainty-aware in-principle scalable Digital Shadow.

The World Wide Lab (WWL) connects the Digital Shadows (DSs) of processes, products, companies, and other entities allowing the exchange of information across company boundaries. Since DSs are context- and purpose-specific representations of a process, as opposed to Digital Twins (DTs) which offer a full simulation, the integration of a process into the WWL requires the creation of DSs representing different aspects of the process. Human-Robot Collaboration (HRC) for assembly processes was recently studied in the context of the WWL where Behaviour Trees (BTs) were proposed as a standard task-level representation of these processes. We extend previous work by proposing to standardise safety functions that can be directly integrated into these BTs. This addition uses the WWL as a communication and information exchange platform allowing industrial and academic practitioners to exchange, reuse, and experiment with different safety requirements and solutions in the WWL.

Making a high-quality gear cannot be learned simply from an Internet search. You may find guidelines, papers, rules, lectures, and videos. However, applying this general knowledge to a specific production process and dealing with uncertainties and disruptions requires special know-how, most of which resides in people's heads and networks and is acquired to a large extent through "learning by doing." Over 10 years ago, the vision of Industry 4.05 was announced at the Hannover Fair 2011 as part of the German/European High-Tech Strategy and adopted internationally by the Japanese Industrial Value Chain Initiative, the Advanced Manufacturing Initiative in the U.S., the Chinese Made in China 2025 strategy, the South Korean Manufacturing 3.0, and the U.K.'s High-Value Manufacturing Catapult research center. This "fourth industrial revolution" follows the earlier stages of mechanization (steam engine), mass production (assembly lines), and IT-based electronic automation.

Back in 2019, Ben Lorica and I wrote about deepfakes. Ben and I argued (in agreement with The Grugq and others in the infosec community) that the real danger wasn't "Deep Fakes." The real danger is cheap fakes, fakes that can be produced quickly, easily, in bulk, and at virtually no cost. Tactically, it makes little sense to spend money and time on expensive AI when people can be fooled in bulk much more cheaply. I don't know if The Grugq has changed his thinking, but there was an obvious problem with that argument.